Many of us have a spreadsheet or we have read many posts with the best known managers (most of them are Legendary users) and their new bounty campaigns, but the reality is that it is not about managers to be paid for the hard work we do because if the project does not get enough funds, Nobody receives their reward. Everything depends on the success of the project, that is clear.
As for managers, do you take into consideration the rank of the user who manages the campaign?
Because I've seen Sr members in campaigns promoted by Jr. Members, so I don't know if the level of user is a deadline between Trustful, Scam or Successfully ICOs.
The success of a campaign do not depend on the level of the manager. I already joined a campaign whose manager is a junior member and yes the project do succeded and the manager also distribute the right amount of tokens.
On the other side, I also join a campaign managed by a well-known manager. But the campaign did not reach the soft cap or the whole campaign is just a scam. So it is not always about the manager.