members of the USA government different in response to the crypto world, some members choose to make strict rules and some choose to support crypto, the SEC rejects the Bitcoin ETF but does not give a response to US lawmakers who have Bitcoin.
I think it's not objective, if the SEC wants to ban bitcoin ETF, I think the SEC must ban and confiscate bitcoin from every USA resident, including USA lawmakers.
because many from the USA lawmakers that have lots of Bitcoin.
What the fuck are you on about, the rules for an ETF and the rules for ownership are two very distinctive and different things, what you're saying makes zero sense.
relax bro ! i mean like this, i predict that bitcoin ETF will have a huge influence for crypto world, even i think that bitcoin ETF is part of the important factor that can make the market normal again.
I also think that bitcoin ETF will be the first in the USA and that bitcoin ETFs will provide great benefits to the USA community. some of the points we have to pay attention are when USA lawmakers have a lot of bitcoin, I think this bitcoin ETF will be used by many people, if the SEC gives a negative response to the bitcoin ETF, then ETF benefits will not be felt by everyone, including USA lawmakers.
the hard sentence is better the SEC also confiscated all BTC.