>Nano has 756 TPS [1]. For a self-proclaimed global currency, its a total joke. VISA can handle over 56,000 TPS [2]. Nanos claim to be global currency is either delusional or fraud.
>7,000 TPS was boosted and promoted in Dec 2017. Reality, a meagre 100-200 TPS [3].
>Lead Devs are jumping ship. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and future problems.
>Millions of USD sold from the Nano Developer Wallet lately at extremely low prices. Not a good sign that Devs are dumping Nano in fire sale [4].
>Dev fund is dangerously low, they may burn through that in a matter of 1-3 years [4]. Also; pending lawsuit against Nano foundation.
>Constant node issues. Withdrawals/deposits suspended on several exchanges due to security and stability issues, multiple times, every single month. This despite being miles behind having any sort of global currency traffic. Nano could be years away from even having the potential to be a well-functioning global currency. One example from today [5].
>Coinbase will only use coins stable for multiple months. Nano is far away from that, see above and [5]. Best case scenario is having Nano on Coinbase late 2019, leaving Nano hopelessly behind other cryptocurrencies.
>One single miner can destroy the network via DDoS with 500 GPUs at no cost. A critical attack vector never seriously addressed by the Nano dev team. Nano is wide open for a massive spam attack crippling the network for a long time. Not ready for global adoption.
>Nano team seem like tech amateurs. Dont understand the difference between Random (not cryptographically secure) and SecureRandom. Dont even understand basic cryptography, disaster in waiting.
>Nano team marketing strategy is to have no marketing strategy.
>Nano team adoption strategy is to have no adoption strategy. Doomed. Will go to zero.
>Nano essentially following same strategy as Betamax vs VHS and HD vs BluRay.
>First coin on Amazon/eBay/etc will be the global currency. Nanos avoiding partnership. Nanos publicly stated strategy is to not seek strategic partnership, basis being that USD has no partnership as a currency, so why should Nano have one. Ridiculous.
>No smart contracts. Masternode coins utilising high capacity data contracts on their second layer are the future. Nano can't do any of this, it cannot compete with other coins.
>Must run expensive nodes for free. A borderline insane and untested business model.
>Nano team are business amateurs. Pushed BitGrail when clearly a dangerous exchange. Guaranteed bomber as a good guy. Rebranded to Nano right before BitGrail exploded. Retarded decision. Marketing disaster.
>Going from UDP to TCP too late and too slowly [6]
>Hired pretty girl, G. Coxton, whos done nothing. Whys she not on YouTube pushing Nano?
>Nano has no human face for people to connect with. Its just an empty logo, unlike other top 10 coins e.g. Ethereum has Vitalik, Tron has Justin Sun, Litecoin had Charlie Lee. NEO has Da Hong Fei. EOS has Dan L. etc.
>Ongoing lawsuits against Nano Devs personally and Nano foundation. Will drive price down, could go bankrupt.