Pasteurized milk is healthy and safe. Irradiated strawberries are healthy and safe, and they taste and look the same. Should she be allowed to sell an unsafe combination of fresh dairy and contaminated fruit ? Sure, if the customers understand the risks and take full responsibility for the outcome.

As it turns out, the customers don't understand the risk, and choose not to be bothered by the issue by appointing a regulator which, imperfect and inefficient as it may be, does the job acceptably well. So well in fact, that the customer base have grown accustomed to the idea that any food they can purchase over the counter is healthy and safe. What Kris is actually doing is trying to sneak a product that does not pass the regulator's scrutiny directly to the customer base which assumes that it does. The product is thus misrepresented in the market place, and should be removed.

I have absolutely no problem with the idea that, after waiving their legal rights and understanding the risks, customers should be allowed to eat anything. Except for extreme cases like depression or cult-induced suicide, your life is your property and you should do what you want. If you have a problem with the notion that all food must be proved safe by default, and a waiver is required when unsafe food is sold, then you can, you know, start your own country where all food is presumed unsafe and it's the customer's responsibility to make sure it's ok - we had that for many centuries, it didn't worked out so well. There are many such countries in fact, no need to start another one. Anything sold in the 3rd world must be boiled and killed with fire before being eaten, and eating improper food is a major death cause there.