Just did a test:
Rig setup:
Linuxcoin v0.2b (Linux version 2.6.38-2-amd64)
Dual HD5970 (4 GPU cores in the rig)
Mem clock @ 300Mhz
Core clock @ 800Mhz
VCore @ 1.125v
AMD SDK 2.5
Phoenix r100
Phatk v2.2
-v -k phatk BFI_INT VECTORS WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false
Result:
Overall Rig rate: 1484 MH/s
Rate per core: 371 MH/s
This is ~4MH/s faster than Diapolo's latest.
On 5970, phatk 2.2 is current king of the hill.
For the world to be perfect, this kernel needs to be integrated into cgminer
Rig setup:
Linuxcoin v0.2b (Linux version 2.6.38-2-amd64)
Dual HD5970 (4 GPU cores in the rig)
Mem clock @ 300Mhz
Core clock @ 800Mhz
VCore @ 1.125v
AMD SDK 2.5
Phoenix r100
Phatk v2.2
-v -k phatk BFI_INT VECTORS WORKSIZE=256 AGGRESSION=11 FASTLOOP=false
Result:
Overall Rig rate: 1484 MH/s
Rate per core: 371 MH/s
This is ~4MH/s faster than Diapolo's latest.
On 5970, phatk 2.2 is current king of the hill.
For the world to be perfect, this kernel needs to be integrated into cgminer
The last kernel releases show, that it is a bit of trial and error to find THE perfect kernel for a specific setup. Phaetus and I try to use the KernelAnalyzer and our Setups as a first measurement, if a new Kernel got "faster". But there are many different factors that come into play like OS, driver, SDK, miner-software and so on.
I would suggest that we should try to create a kernel which is based on the same kernel-parameters for phatk and phatk-Diapolo so that the users are free to chose which kernel is used. One thing is CGMINER kernel uses the switch VECTORS2, where Phoenix used only VECTORS (which I changed to VECTORS2 in my last kernel releases). It doesn't even matter to use the same variable names in the kernel (in fact they are different sometimes) as long as the main miner software passes the awaited values in a defined sequence to the kernel.
Dia