The history of science is full of wrong ideas, and of their eventual rejection.
The way to understand, ask what is a scientific hypothesis?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HypothesisThere is little more than this, except that various social and political factors certainly can influence science.
An example is "global warming." There is no formulated hypothesis capable of being tested, yet it is widely considered science. It is more accurately a "belief."
A scientist can belief in many things which are not testable by scientific hypothesis.
That is really what confuses me alot. If they hypothesis was based on the scientific method conducted by the scientists therefore both theorom were just a possibility. Which one will I believing if both hypothesis have solid evidences.
That only shows that science is not consistent because if thats the caseI believe that both scientists should came up with the same hypothesis.
Note that the only constant in this world is change.
If that is the case that scientists will just based their hypothesis to their beliefs then the study is not a fact