Very interesting. Both points seem reasonable. Refunds have been issued. There are no explanations of any escrow transactions.
Here are a couple users talking about the starting price of the coin and the refund price.
Thanks for the detailed explanation. If we are somewhere near .0000933 then from my initial BTC investment only around 1 out of 6 would be returned.
Not sure where you get that? Initial rate was .0002036 BTC / NVST
So it is a 46% refund against btc value. Now if you count the bcash fork it is a bit less.
If someone invested in ETH, for every 1 ETH they sent they are getting the equivalent of 1.22 back. Not too bad for a consolation prize.
Which would mean 45.8% refund as he stated ( .0000933 / .0002036 = .458 aka 45.8%). I was under the impression that 60% would be refunded based on previous statements made here... is that true? Not sure, I'm really not looking too deep into this but offering some speculation and questions. What % went to the escrows?
Now despite the low refund percent, Bitcoin has rose to a huge level so the dollar amount of the refund is actually greater than the dollar amount that was used to originally buy the ICO. What would the gain have been if they never deposited money into the ICO? Does the refund mean everybody's reputation is 'cleared' from a scam or does a detailed analysis of the escrow wallet and all its debits and credits still need to be done? (probably a good idea either way)
I find some interest in the "41.78678295 BTC will be set aside until a solution to this issue is found".
Just some thought provoking questions. I and everybody else are working with incomplete information and no evidence from blockchain tracing has been put forth so the presumption would be innocent until proven guilty.