Hello all, just wanted to stop by and give some development updates... We are looking into the idea of modifying the future of the project in terms of when PoS kicks in and implementation of MasterNodes into POLY itself.
Given the release of POLYSHIELD public beta which is right around the corner, and offering MasterNode host/share and stakepool... We thought it might be nice that POLY itself be included in both aspects of that aside from being the 'main token' for the platform.
So, we would like to get the community's opinion on the following:
1. We are considering implementing MasterNodes into POLY sooner than block 800k. This could be much sooner, we were thinking within the next couple months.
2. We were also considering modifying the algo a bit , (this is not necessary, simply something that one of the devs on the team brought up) to further ensure the lack of ASIC ability (aside from our own ASIC devices which would only make sense as small home devices, but this is a long time in the future so we aren't worried about it right now.)
3. POLYSHIELD team is considering making its own POLY wallet, which would contain extra functionality built by and for the POLYSHIELD platform. It would contain all the function of the MasterNode host/share, stakepool, (poloniex lendbot potentially), and more built in a 'wrapper' that would essentially be a 'new wallet' for POLY. We wanted to get some opinions on this. The wallet would not be the 'official wallet' merely a '3rd party' wallet built by and for use of POLYSHIELD. It would also be able to implement other unique features. Potentially making use of the Discord POLY.bot for some cool unique features and functionality. We wanted to see the response of the community on this idea.
4. We are considering implementation of PoS into POLY sooner than block 800k as well, with also implementation of the MasterNodes into POLY itself. This would enable staking of the coins already mined, and allow POLY itself to be part of the stakepool being made by POLYSHIELD.
We are anxiously awaiting the replies of the community on these points, and any other opinions on POLY or anything POLY related, overall. Thank you!
Also we wanted to thank crowetic for assisting POLY in getting its second exchange listing. Thanks!
translate google rus to english
Hi,
0. It's unclear when to wait for the beta version, this month? this year? The deadlines are not clear.
1. Why not, I'm for. The main thing is that everything would work, it is stable and there was no violation of integrity.
2. I'm against it. I understand how you want to make an asik stable algorithm and at the same time produce an asik? if you can make your own asik, then another organization can also. Sense is lost.
3. I am for, but this idea can be tolerated. And again the main thing is that everything would work stably and there was no crude version.
4. I am for, also provided the stability of the entire system.
Oтвeт нa pyccкoм:
пpивeт,
0. Heпoнятнo, кoгдa ждaть бeтa вepcию, в этoм мecяцe? в этoм гoдy? He пoнятны cpoки.
1. Пoчeмy бы и нeт, я зa. Глaвнoe чтo бы вce paбoтaлo,cтaбильнo и нe былo нapyшeнии цeлocтнocти.
2. Я пpoтив. Я кaк пoнял вы xoтитe cдeлaть acикo ycтoйчивый aлгopитм и caми пpи этoм пpoизвoдить acик? ecли вы cмoжeтe cдeлaть cвoй acик тo и дpyгaя opгaнизaция тoжe cмoжeт. Cмыcл тepяeтcя.
3. Я зa, нo этa идeя мoжeт пoтepпeть. И oпять глaвнoe, чтo бы paбoтaлo вce cтaбильнo и нe былa cыpaя вepcия.
4. Я зa, тaкжe пpи ycлoвии cтaбильнocти paбoтocпocoбнocти вceй cиcтeмы.