A month ago i asked the owner of an online store accepted btc (he is a crypto enthusiast), whether they want to add gbyte. He told me that i was the only one who asked such a question and that he had never heard of it. After he conducted his research, he replied that he would not have added this shitcoin even if thousands of his clients had asked for it. He said that using this coin is equivalent to shooting in the leg, that no adequate person will want to use an coin that is losing 95% of the value for a year. And even if the price was stable, he would not use a coin controlled by one person.
Stop asking people who understand basic economics please.
TBF though the 90% loss in value is kind of what most alts have suffered ...........but one as outstanding technically as byteball should not have had to. The distribution process was a demonstration of how you can crush even the best work if you try hard enough.
Soon most people will have no reason to use anything other than btc sadly
byteball could have been great and perhaps it still will be but the stupid distribution model will take a while to iron out especially as we have crushed investor confidence by changing the rules and such dramatic losses ... .and still we have more tokens to saturate the market and still have so many tokens in the hands of other ico managers
there are solutions but nobody wants to take the actions required to turn it around fast