You won't get able any answer if you show pessimism/negative views towards Bitcoin on r/bitcoin. You better ask this forum or
Actually I did get an answer but not a proper one. Dont know if it was an admin but whoever it was said he will get back to me and never did. Then again its not a customer service but thats ok.
Still to point out, How does it matter if I was showing negative view?
Is current structure so weak that it wont stand any criticism?
It's hard to avoid
centralized centered LN nodes since merchants or nodes with high liquidity/balance naturally would have high connected channel since people would open new channel (merchant) if there aren't any available path/route and there's fewer available path/route (merchants & nodes with high liquidity/balance) if you intend to use LN for bigger payment.
This thread
Basics of the Lightning Network - explanation and wallets should give you more information.
I know, that's my concern. I dont have anything better to offer but I can point out what I see as an upcoming problem.
It's not really a solution. They postpone the problem.
Increasing a variable (blocksize) can never be a scaling solution.
A lot of new problems appear with a bigger blocksize which shouldn't be ignored.
What kind of problem are you referring to. I would like to read something on it.