Hello team. First of all, before moving to my questions, I’d like to congratulate team on building this website. I’m glad that we finally have a platform for serious, factual discussions about the project unlike the Telegram chat where one can easily get harassed or banned for asking questions. I’m more than sure that there’s a bright future for the project. My questions are as follows.

1.    What is nature of the recently announced “partnership” of MSP with KPMG? I can’t find any confirmation of the said partnership on KPMG side. Did you solely ask KPMG to provide you with their auditing services and called it a “partnership”?

2.    On May 2, a buyback of 285.4351ETH (~$214076.32 back then) worth MSP tokens on Cryptopia and HitBTC was announced. These funds were gone soon after this date, as can everyone check by searching the buyback ETH wallet. This caused a major movement of MSP token price. Some time after the announcement it was announced that the buyback is complete and you have burned all tokens according to the initial announcement. However, you never provided the community with the address of the wallet were the burn had happened and never answered further questions about the burn. While I truly believe that you were just too busy with development of a quality product and forgot to post it, could you just for a sake of transparency provide us with the address where the burn had happened in May as you announced? To the best of my knowledge a burn of ETH tokens (just like MSP) is as simple as sending coins to null (0x…) address, so it’ll be the easiest way to answer all the burning questions about the burn.

3.    Do you plan to hire a competent project manager in the near future, as it can be guessed that constantly missed deadlines (it’s fourth time in a row, as far as I can remember- a good few months overdue) are signs of bad project management policies?

4.    Next question relates to the recent problems of Dylan Damsma with providing a proof to the Estonian government that he hasn’t committed any crimes. As this effectively have been blocking Mothership with getting licenses for weeks already, could you tell us what was the reason to make a Chief Growth Officer and a very recent addition to the team a boardmember of the project? Do you have any “plan B” for the project in the case if he still won’t be able to provide the proof?

5.    Could you comment in what ways do you plan to compete with Binance and other exchange now, as more and more of them succeed in obtaining official Fiat trading licenses from respective governments over Europe, Asia and North America?

6.    I remember vividly that a few first months of the project development were concentrated on the ICO platform Genesis. It was supposed to give MSP token holders direct benefits for participating in ICOs hosted on it. Last year the CEO and cofounder of Mothership - Arseniy Zarechnev - announced that Mothership is having negotiations with several promising projects to launch their ICOs on Genesis. The only ICO that took place was a befriended Estonian project Consensus.ai and the Genesis platform is completely gone at the time of writing this post without any registration form available for projects that could be interested in getting involved (there used to be such a form on the Genesis website). What happened with the said projects that Arseniy was negotiating with? Is the platform completely abandoned despite the months long efforts to build it?

7.    When can we expect token utilities to be revealed?

8.    Forgive me this last, a bit lighthearted question. Will we be able to post these funny MSP pictures on Mothership longue - LOL! :slight_smile:

I am sure that there’s no such thing as a hard question for this wonderful team, so I look forward to hearing your answers together with the whole community!