What I'd like to know is how you plan to implement my Proof-Of-Audit theory, as it's my theory. You have no way to describe it outside of my own writings, bordering on plagiarism.

Funny to see coins already pretending to use features we're developing in house.  


Also, about your coin:
Will you be staking the premine for your 1500% ROI period?

If not, how do we know you won't?

Actually, nevermind, I've already got the answer to my question.

The vestx premine is being split up and spread out and staked under different accounts. The premine is not just a premine, it's now being staked to exploit the 1500% ROI.

The developer does not mention this.

Note: the block explorer does not generate proper links, so you must use the IP.

Transaction PREMINE sends to RANDOM ACCOUNT [U1V...]:
http://167.99.179.149:3005/tx/842d9ac494fb21d3df7bc73a061b243d0e2e45acb7983f6a71d9d2e78eab78d9

Random account now STAKING:
http://167.99.179.149:3005/address/U1VjZpqZyM5hA32RSoSX6k4qQ6AKity1t4

The above TX is from the premine, sending part of the premine to a random account, which is now staking. I believe this is likely happening alot, and the current VestX developer is simply taking his time splitting it up to dump on buyers.

The Vestx premine is being staked and likely being sold on the market.

This coin does not have the ability to implement proof of audit, which is my own theory. Be warned about this project and any others trying to piggyback off Peepcoin-DAPS, especially ones like this which plagiarize features and make promises they cannot actually achieve.