To be honest, my comment may be a bit harsh at this stage, the coin is yet to go to the exchange, and could shock us all in this bear market, who knows. My point is, producing an ICO (even a masternode pre-sale is a form of ICO) in exchange for BTC or ETH which currently hold value, often results in the end purchaser never recovering their initial investment as 9/10 times ICO's fall clearly under their pre-sale price (something guaranteed to happen in today's market) 

It then becomes a long and arduous path to recovery with incessant screaming from investors and newcomers alike. Something strikes me about this coin in similarity with some other projects I have seen especially from a marketing perspective, the worrying part is the devs of those projects are shady and are known to start projects, string a community together, get what they need, abandon, change names, and start another project leaving them to a community takeover. I'm not saying that will happen here, I certainly hope it does not, however, frighteningly similar patterns, could be pure coincidence.

As for Lauda, her word carries no weight either, and she has been removed as a BTCtalk moderator due to extortion/merit abuse/negative trust abuse.  After all, she gave me neg trust for merely having an opinion that differed from her own. Plus it looks like you say it too with a grammatical error here ..."Lauda who is extremely well known and one of the pioneers of bitcointalk for trying to deceive people in the past"... So you agree she is a well-known pioneer in deceiving people?  I'm just joshing with ya, you seem a nice guy, let's see how this project plays out at least and I hope my gut is wrong for a change.