Keep in mind, the ban is usually from a marketing admin (who are just random individuals that provide little to no marketing benefit but were given marketing title/admin advantages on discord). Except for OVERLODE and in some instances Ario, none of the stated marketing admins provide tangible benefits to the coin, but they are provided the right to exercise power on discord that severely surpasses the benefit they provide to the project. I would even say that i have probably invested more BTC into this project than most of this supposedly marketing but not really marketing guys.
Please understand that those on the marketing team are not compensated in any way, shape, or form. We do bounce ideas off each other in a private channel. Advice is offered (like a board). There is such thing as a time investment (which is most valuable and one you seem to overlook).
I've spoken to you before, Airlinepossession about your concerns, of which were regurgitated statements about the same misinformation (which you stated, "I didn't know").
A agree with some of your points, however... your delivery needs work.
That said, there is always room for improvement.
Compensated or not, the fact that some of this guys that provide zero tangible benefit than get on the thread and shill bs about moon have the right to ban ppl for speaking on a proven fact, then claim they were insulted when they instigated the whole thing is annoying. Like i stated before, am not a docile sheep that sits in the corner and be berated by some individual and i choose not to respond cos they have some flunky admin title esp when the individual provide nothing tangible to the topic at hand.
As for the conversation we had, i will admit that you were responsible for letting me know that the admin was finally doing working on fixing the issue with the algo, but when you told me this, the news that were working on it was only a week old while the issue itself was identified but not worked on for several months. This was a known issue that should have been dealt with with immediate urgency but he waited till the coin dumped from a stable 1000 sat to the lower 200 before he decided to act.
The dev is on discord claiming that my final question that raised this hoopla was a constant repeat from me and am still waiting on that screenshot to prove it cos i know for a fact that it was the first time i posed that question. He specifically stated that the coin will be in maintenance for 1 week, and its two months later with no update/ possible date on when trading might commence and he has a problem with me posing a statement regarding the matter/responding crassly to one of his marketing guy, when the marketing (but not really marketing) guy choose to hurl the first insult.
The admin choose not to accept any responsibility as if they don't realize that a lot of money is invested into this project and BTC does not fall from sky. I guess, he barely has that much personally invested into the coin from a financial aspect, so its all gain for him. That why he helped lure several ppl to octaex, and claimed aloof when shit hit the fan. coinmarkets tried the same shit, but eca dev been the coin with the biggest volume, took matters into their hand and resolved it. Aro was the only coin with volume on octaex, and he personally guided a bunch of ppl to that site with the announcements/ constant suggestion to buy from the site, but when shit hit the fan and they pulled an act quite similar to coinsmarket, the dev stated that he didn't force anyone to use the site and slptome ( a marketing but not really marketing admin) was clowning ppl who lost hard earned money for using the site even though they promoted the shit out of the site.
Again, i have no problem with the tech, but the idea of banning ppl, if they don't adhere to the happy go lucky bullshit promoted on the thread, esp when we all know there is a lot to be currently unhappy about is what pisses me off. By the way, zean has yet to exhale in awhile but left up to everyone, shit is all good.