...
4. @Astargath no you didn't explain it, you posted memes and are unable to articulate your argument. You're asking the reader to believe the Earth is a globe based on unspecified equations and can't produce them for analysis. That's some nice fucking strategy to keep me from debunking the claims you copy&pasted. I can prove mathematically that adding more wells (or sticks) to Eratosthenes (was he even a real person?) experiment doesn't change the results, I can add any number of wells and the results are the same for a globe or a plane.
4. @Astargath no you didn't explain it, you posted memes and are unable to articulate your argument. You're asking the reader to believe the Earth is a globe based on unspecified equations and can't produce them for analysis. That's some nice fucking strategy to keep me from debunking the claims you copy&pasted. I can prove mathematically that adding more wells (or sticks) to Eratosthenes (was he even a real person?) experiment doesn't change the results, I can add any number of wells and the results are the same for a globe or a plane.
But all formulas and even a method that you or anyone can do are found here: https://takethisskepticalblog.wordpress.com/2015/10/21/how-to-disprove-the-flat-earth/
:^) welcome to reality.
That blog post debunks a strawman flat Earth model; Eratosthenes works for both a globe and a plane, it proves neither.
What exactly is wrong about that flat earth model? Are you changing definitions and other stuff again to fit your twisted view of reality?
They used a Flat Earth meme (meme is short for blasphemy) as their fucking model. FE threatens anybody who's an atheist, a belief system only possible in the heliocentric spinning globe model; FE is literally blasphemy for an atheist. The Synagogue of Satan created atheism, the Jew needs useful idiots like atheists in his never ending war on God.
If you need "what exactly" is wrong you can start with the fact atmospheric refraction, magnification and lensing aren't taken into account in either fucking model. The globe is a fucking crock of shit and every argument or so-called proof is a strawman, a lie, a forgery or a distortion of the facts. I'd go on but, the fact these factors are missing means that whole fucking blog post is garbage.
ROFL everytime someone debunks flat earth you come up with new ''stuff'' to throw around, REFRACTION, THE SUN IS NOT REAL, IT'S MAGIC, give me a break lmao.
So let me get this straight, when for example a selenelion lunar eclipse occurs:
"A selenelion or selenehelion occurs when both the Sun and an eclipsed Moon can be observed at the same time." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_eclipse#Selenelion
You're forced to cry:
"But wait! How is this possible? When we have a lunar eclipse, the sun, Earth and moon are in a geometrically straight line in space, with the Earth in the middle. So if the sun is above the horizon, the moon must be below the horizon and completely out of sight (or vice versa). And indeed, during a lunar eclipse, the sun and moon are exactly 180 degrees apart in the sky; so in a perfect alignment like this (a "syzygy") such an observation would seem impossible. But it is atmospheric refraction that makes a selenelion possible." -- https://www.space.com/13856-total-lunar-eclipse-rare-senelion.html
When I say your proof we're on a globe that uses the Sun's position in the sky to cast shadows doesn't include refraction, you then cry that I'm inventing shit? How about the globe is a crock of shit instead, did that thought ever cross your mind? No wait what am I thinking, you don't have any thoughts of your own, you just copy & paste the shit the Jews and their media empire feeds you. This is some Nineteen Eighty-Four tier shit you're pushing.