If the devs where payed in WBD where they can exchange WEBD for $?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not everybody have money to sustain the mining from their own pocket
In the beginning of BTC no one tough how they cashing sell BTC faster. They did from passion. And now you can see the result of their passion. This is what we want too from WebDollar Community.
Don't compare this coin with BTC or this time when we have so many exchanges with 2009.
You want to say that WEBD will have his own exchange where the creators will dump 4 billions of coins? You can't go more centralized than this. You can beat BITMAIN if you do this.
We want an answer about the exchanges. Not everybody wants to mine forever and keep your coins.
You're funny. Nobody will dump the coins, it is not ethical and healthy for the project. We didn't do any ICO in order to have money for paying exchanges to list us. anyone from the community can list WebDollar anywhere. We just developed a technology. Sky is the limit, you can list WebDollar everywhere you want. Due to high costs of listing a coin we're developing the ecosystem exchange where everyone will be able to trade WebDollar at the cheapest fees.
"You're funny. Nobody will dump the coins, it is not ethical and healthy for the project"I may be funny but I know for sure that if you have a good project your coin will be listed for free on the biggest exchanges. Take IOTA for example.
If you create your own exchange how do you plan to bring the buyers because you will have a lot of sellers?
Who is developing this project? Are you an organization, foundation or something?
Do not mess things up. IOTA had ICO premined 100% for investors => funds for developing and listing.
We did chose the second way. We finished the tech and now after finishing the exchange we will do marketing with our own resources in order to achieve an organic growth. We're not an foundation and we don't need to be because we didn't need to ask anyone to fund us in order to finish the tech. Like BTC we developed a tech and our community with us will develop the project. Explorers, exchange listings, etc.
I like this approach, which reminds of the old spirit of the first Bitcoin pioneers. Now most of the projects are about how fast a new coin is getting to an established exchange so that the firstcomers can play at the musical chair at who is dumping the coins at the highest price before others do and who is the unlucky one left in the role of the bagholder full of worthless coins. Nobody cares about tech any more if not as a pretext for a pump&dump. And now here we have the team of Webdollar who, in spite of having chosen a quite terrible name for their coin, are passionate about developing their project regardless of all these common crypto miseries.
Do they contraddict themselves on this path? Yes, they do, again and again. Because that happens when you are working for the aim of creating something new.
I like this.
I have to agree with you on that. With all due respect for their tecnical skills I have been quite critical on the chaotic planning (or lack of proper planning) of the team. But certainly if you look at the whole issue this way, then we can just only see those mistakes as minor quite irrelevant issues.