Just recently i noticed a common trend with almost all ICOs.
There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.
Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.
Since the amount of tokens given to bounty hunters is incomparably smaller than that of investors, this measure is implemented to have a soothing effect on investors rather than for real prevention of price falling during the first days(and sometimes hours) of coin's appearance on the markets. In reality it is them, the investors, who sell their coins immediately when it becomes possible, thus significantly reducing the price. I don't blame them because in many cases only this way (by selling as early as possible) you can return your investments or even make some profits, but they should not blame the bounty hunters in the price dropping either.
And let's imagine a situation when bounty hunters do impact the market by their selling. If you believe in a coin then buy when bounty hunters are selling or just hold. What's the problem? If you know that it's a good coin and it will rise in the future then you only will make more profits, right?