I know many of us are now a day trying to filter scam ICO with genuine one but I have a question here?

What is role of BitcoinTalk forum administrative team in scam accusations being made about all ICO's

I was going through the list of scam accusations here and even after proving they are scam I was able to find many programs still having a live bounty program going on?

So how the hell does that affect the scammer?

Bitcointalk forum currently is the leader for cryptocurrency forum and if they are not taking action against scam content, soon we will find more and more scam ICO's coming in this market.

What I feel is if a scam accusation is made against any ICO, the owner of thread should be notified to respond in a particular given period of time for that accusation and thread should be till then kept as closed. Once we get satisfactory answers for the content, then only the thread should be reopened. Obviously the scam accusation proof should be satisfactory enough to keep the thread closed.

This will save bounty hunters time and will also give them good chance in participating in Good ICO rather then working for Scam program. With more and more scam websites coming to the market, this needs to be implemented soon to keep everything on track.


Would like to hear comments on this.

Thanks