Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: 📢 [ANN]Black Insurance digital insurance company on the blockchain
by
martparve
on 14/09/2018, 11:15:21 UTC
Quote from: Colibra on September 14, 2018, 11:12:47 AM
Quote from: martparve on September 12, 2018, 01:47:50 PM
Quote from: martparve on September 12, 2018, 09:33:06 AM
Quote from: Colibra on September 12, 2018, 08:23:42 AM
Quote from: martparve on September 11, 2018, 10:24:44 AM
Quote from: Cryptolabdotone on September 11, 2018, 07:39:43 AM
Black Insurance is already rated by Cryptolaboratory. All facts are here. Don't miss it!  Wink


Thanks! I would point out that the ratings that you link to have improved meanwhile, e.g. ICOBench is up at 4.9 points now Smiley

I just had a look at ICOBench and didn't find any experts rating for the projects. Strange indeed! The project is so prominent but we still can't read a feedback about it and posted online.



I find it quite curious as well. There has been a lot of talk that the ICOBench experts only rate ICO-s that pay them loads of money. In this regard, I'm wondering what's the true value of these ratings? "I approve of this ICO since they paid me 2 BTC"...?

Anyhow, I'll ask our team to reach out to some experts to see if they play ball.

Considering how many complete scam ICO-s there are out there, and that we have a legit team with loads of industry background, they well should look into our ICO, don't you all think?

Glad to announce that the first ICOBench review is in, and it's not too shabby at all Smiley Hope to get some more during the next days.

https://icobench.com/ico/black-insurance/ratings#ratings

Actually, as far as I know, there is a pretty easy way for gaining more recognition from all kinds of experts without the need to pay extra money. I am not sure if the majority of the experts giving rates to the ICOBench projects are scammers or not but... I've heard that a common strategy is to write private messages to different people directly on linked in, building a strong engagement and connection with them. But even without it you could still ask for feedback from their side, share some docs. This way many projects receive good valuable comments. Although there are some TOP ICOBench experts who rate the projects driven by the need to keep their own rating higher... some valuable, authentic feedback is not something unusual.


Anyways... I am not judging, just giving some practices as an example and being curious about the stuff around. All the best!



Thanks! Funny as it might be, we did exactly what you just described during the last few days. Have 3 reviews now, and just had an almost 1-hour call with one particularly thorough ICOBench reviewer. So I trust a few more reviews should come in soon.