That is not what I wrote. Claiming that BCH is bitcoin is not the same as claiming BCH is BTC.
BTC is currently Bitcoin, aye. As it is the chain built atop the Satoshi genesis block that has the most accumulated SHA256 proof of work.
It may not always be such.
As an aside, anyone that mistakes BCH for BTC had obviously not even started to do the necessary due diligence for trading in this market. I have no sympathy for anyone incurring losses on this basis.
This seems very dishonest to me.
Roger has tried to trick others into buying Bcash when saying it's bitcoin. He also has spent money to do spam attacks on bitcoin.
If he has claimed that BCH is BTC, then that is news to me. Proof?
-Roger claims BCH is bitcoin.
-The person you quotes says Roger claims Bcash is Bitcoin.
Both of those statements are true. The only difference is what you call Bitcoin Cash.
You changed it to Roger claiming BCH is BTC, which is sort of silly. Obviously BCH!=BTC. Two different things. But Roger believes BCH/Bcash/Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin.
Your rebuttal is sidestepping, and changing the argument. And changing it in a stupid way.