I think the project with such achievements does not need to be represented on rating sites. Especially now, all sites that issue rating projects are not at all objective.
The rating of website / analysis is are important. The rate may able to given a good feed back until as reference. What are you worries about that? just be believe about project have big potential / high quality.
I'm worried about that? Bro, believe me you're wrong. I'm just telling you that Kama does not need ratings. The time has passed when people oriented on this sites, now only Icodrops remained honest from all the rating sites.
I was told to you about "Reference" external. Then how can those people be interested if a work has no rank / level / ratings?
There are a lot of sources besides rating sites. News resources, a lot of video sources, relevant topics in this forum. In the case of Kamagames, there is already a product with millions of users. All this is of interest. Rating sites have long discredited themselves as a valuation mechanism and are an indicator of "who paid for the exposed rating." I am in a lot of groups in the telegram where ICO is discussed and the standing projects are selected, are in major discord communities engaged in investing, and nowhere are seriously considered ratings. No one has been paying attention to ratings for a long time. This is my observation. Perhaps you have a different point of view and you have the right to adhere to it
i disagree on your observation, rating on an ICO is just an review of every move of the project. it might not be acurate but rating make the preject review by others. i personaly obeserve ICO on rating sites.