I totally agree that past events shouldn't be considered an effective means of predicting the future, but you don't seem to be applying that principle to your writing here, nor do others in the thread. 

The whole article seems to be basing itself on the idea that if it just claims that seasonality is a thing and enough people see it, they'll believe it and it'll become true.  It seems to just be a self-fulfilling prophecy.

At the moment, Bitcoin seems to be in the midst of a settling down phase.  Wild speculation could be quite harmful to that.