Good point. But doesn't that remove the liberty of the merit sources (which the admins chosen) to give merits base from their own judgement or criteria?
...
This makes no sense whatsoever, but since you exercised the poor judgment to wander into this thread in the first place despite a post history that even a mother couldn't love...
Post #349 in "Germany recognized the bitcoin" [sic]:
Germany recognizing bitcoin would give a big impact. The country is known to produce good quality of products that is recognized in the world market and a a market player recognizing bitcoin would be big.
Hope there's a link or source for this claim though.
Hope there's a link or source for this claim though.
Post #898 in "Factors that affect the value of bitcoin":
FUD's plays a big factor. These could scare away possible investors and the current ones tend to sell their coins/tokens to "avoid further loss", thus making overflowing amount of supply in the market.
Etc.
Feel proud of yourself huh? With your 1588 posts and only 117 merit? I guess opposing your opinion will result to shaming. Is this one of your ways to get merit?
Good luck with that
