Even if he is not a good guy that was a good post. It is important for people to know that there are 35-36 new people that can give merit As a source. He mentioned it and gets my points.
Totally your judgement man. Not questioning that. I am just pointing out that it is unfair to hundreds of those posters who get lost in the din because someone like toheed2x spams 1000 reports in the time a serious poster would actually manage to post much less. If the post histories are taken as a reference, then at least the deserving ones get a better chance. Those who just "woke up because of rules change" should have to wait a little longer.
I would just prefer that the "good guys" get more of a chance than the "not a good guys"..
So shared my opinion with you.until the backlog of "jr demoted to newb but did have the occasional good post in their history that was missed so not merited" people gets slogged through, this may look like some of us are too quick to merit someone who got demoted.
but the whole point is (per theymos) all they need is ONE good(ish) post thats meritable and get their rank back. or be able to get to jr rank to begin with.
although with some accounts ya gotta look pretty far back..
I dont want to seem that I am complaining, because frankly, I have nothing to complain about, but one good post is unfortunately not enough, in order to get merit. You would have to invest months of daily (kind of) posting of helpful stuff and if youre lucky you get that merit at some point. Problem is newbies or Jr Members dont receive Merit too often. A least that was the experience I made.
Tbh I expected change of rules sooner rather later, because recently the sh*t posting, just for the sake of posting something (to qualify for bounties) was getting unbearable. Unfortunately there is no way of deciding between Jr Members posting quality posts and those that post rubbish. And thats why everbody was affected 🤔