I'd actually like to hear your point of view on my previous post, Admin. It's rather discouraging to see that you choose to ignore a comments that sounds their concern about your attention to customer's wishes and input.

In regards to the post, may I also highlight that months ago, you said that exchange will come after you have a demand or tangible products or something like that, I failed to recall correctly. I failed even more to see what "preliminary" achievement you need to finally decide that you have enough "foundation" and decide it's time to enliat and be more visible to users worldwide.

Before you got any idea that I was a mere pump-rider or anything around that kind of species, allow me to inform you that you may rest assured, I have a firm belief of your company's future, and I have no intention to sell at all. I even "lock" my tokens by crossing them to the ETH gateway. I understand that land and building business need years to cultivate.

What I don't like is, or rather are, your company decision to keep delaying an exchange that has a potent to bring more awareness of the token. You may argue that this project is more focused on "something real" or a "long-term utilities" and you couldn't care less about exchange and their speculation-enabling-feature, but you might forgot that you're standing on crypto, on a field that's basically cheerish trading and speculations. If your company doesn't care about such and prefer to have your focus undisturbed on establishing tangible product, then I should ask your initial decision to reach crypto. Was it a mistake due to a poor decision? Why don't you reverse the roadmap to make it more suitable to your concept? Namely building offices and reputation for years, establishing yourself, and only after you're well known, you reach crypto. It will surely safe you a lot of time answering demands about details and exchange and price.

If you failed to see how this decision to keep ignoring demands for exchange could affect your progress, allow me to point out one factor, namely community's support. Some with high visionary and firm belief and strong investing knowledge (the name goes on) would stay, true, but some will also eventually lost faith if you failed to show good progress. And this leads me to my second dismayal, namely bad response. Either a bad company culture or a community manager with bad attitude, depends on who in charge of answering posts.

Before you pass judgment, I'll humbly ask you to review back few pages to see that I have never clashed way with you, so I'm confident when I said that this is nothing personal, it's not more than a simple observation, that your responses to criticism, be it possitive or negative, are mostly cam hardly be seen as warm or... diplomatic, if you prefer a more official term. A "how is not doable?" from someone who represent business space rental that operates worldwide is certainly least to be expected, and certainly discourage people from interacting well by dissuading them from saying what they want to say.