He gave a loan, people defaulted on the loan/loans and he is left with bitcointalk accounts as collateral. Of course he will want to liquidate these accounts in order to get his initial capital back instead of being stuck with accounts that he doesn't need?
He obviously did not sell these accounts knowingly to scammers.
And he's stopping now, and i presume this is something done way back. Why are you picking up on this now?
You are free to read the whole thread this quote is from.
If you look long enough into anybody's history, you'll find probably always find things, as controversial they may be.
Your short lived history is already filled with things, and it isn't like you're saying "Oh okay, I thought I helped, just picked up implications, sorry" and move on.
If you would have been around back in the days, you'd know that trading accounts was pretty common.
It gradually became more and more controversial as the quantity of scams skyrocketed on the board. (Scams that your "service" is helping, by the way...)
Since then, never touched another account than mine (and my alt that I have tagued with a neutral from my main account, that I use from my phone).
I trade, I help around, I do stuff that makes people happy around me in an ethical way.
Can't really say the same about you, heh ?
Stop seeing the mote in other's eyes and look at the beam in your own. Trying to bring the focus from you and your spam service to other's won't work.