Allow me to snip the entite earlier messages, because you seems to fail to understand how quote feature works, although you seems to have a comprehensive understanding on how emoji works....
For thosw who are interested to know how these... (im)professional banter happened on the first place, kindly scroll.
[...]
How can you expect one to interpret your sarcasm via written text only with no effort to include any sort of emoji (which are available to use here and is what one uses in polite society to convey sarcasm over the internet so there are no misunderstandings because written words are misinterpreted all the time).
My sincerest apology, I am well used with people, both in digital and direct world, that understand sarcasm solely on the whole context of the sentences without the need of emoji. I read somewhere that people who can understand sarcasm are they who are bright on their mind. Emoji themselves usually translated as a hint of non-professionalism in business world. Despite the inability to stay away on sarcasm when the situation pushes me to, I surely tried to stay as away as possible from emojis when I tried to discuss something with an entity that I see as a professional or business body. Well, if you suggested emoji for such situation that we have, may I perceive that . . . . . . . hmm... interesting.
You want politeness? Perhaps you could read your last message to me and decide for yourself whether you are being polite yourself? How polite do you think you are being on a scale from 0-10?
I decide myself? Well, then it'll be at 8, 6 at the lowest. Kindly read again, the whole post was rather delivered in a civil manner at most of the post body, with probably an exception to the closing paragraph, which rather dilluted with opinion --as warned-- but composed based on an observation on how the community manager of this project interact with their members. Don't you agree? Because, I think several people here are on the same page with me. I became less polite when the answer you gave was rather rude, defensive, and seems to be taken personally..
One would perceive such sentence as an input to improve themselves, while others, it seems, and how unfortunate that it should happen on a "room" which aimed to host business spaces.
So, forgive me as I really hard to point out to myself which sentence of my second previous post that can be seen as impolite. Kindly point it out to me? There's a feature on this forum to highlight a sentence, or change the font color, it'll help. Of course, I expect the community manager to know the difference between an impolite input and a mere statement-based opinion?
My apologies if you aren't finding the yes man that agrees with your point of view.
Do I specifically ask you to be a yes man and agree with the post? To try to enlist the second you read my post? I have no intention to it. Again, kindly point out which sentence lead to such opinion.
I expect an open discussion, a healthy debate, and anything along the line, before you (it seems to me) derail everything with defensive-offensive replies instead of explaining why you haven't try any exchange, when will you try them, at which milestones, etc.
Q: "You've tried your way and it didn't show significant improvement, why don't you try the community's suggestion of adding new exchanges to boost visibility, accessibility, and liquidity?"
A: Didn't show significant improvement in what? Getting people to buy and trade more of the token to increase the price of the token? I think it's clear by now that Primalbase doesn't care about the price of the token in the short term. They are focused on building features and eventually getting adoption with those features. They are choosing to spend their time working to cater to the needs of those who would use the token, not speculate over it....especially when they are still working to get their first 5 offices up and leasing feature.
Exactly, improvement at the token price. Usually, the token price will rise and fall at annual news, evwn for a very long term projects, much like how good news in macro and micro economic influence stock, lands, and foreign exchanges. One good example is perhaps lands, one of the investment with a good long duration, how earthquake decrease price of lands an houses on the impacted spot, or how a news of new public place (like mall, hotel, or public transportation station) drive the price of the surrounding buildings up. In your case, perhaps at the announcement of new offices. And kindly tell me, why don't those announcement significantly fluctuate price? Doesn't PrimalBase concerned, even at the very least, that their good news brings very low excitement to their community? Or are you indicating that PrimalBase doesn't care about their community enthusiasm?
Q: After the initial freefall, when the market rises, your price rather stays, when the market fall down, you stay, when you announce buildings, guess what? Yep, your price also stay at relatively same position. I would argue that this is because you are lack of exchange, or lack of access for the community to utilize your project as one of the trading assets. How is this is an embrace of the power of blockchain? (Hint 2: again, this is a rhetorical).
A: I'm not disagreeing with you. I agree that getting more liquidity to the token and doing marketing could possibly drive up prices. The point here is that the company is not focused on that and don't really care much if the price is pumping up or down. So what is the point to continuously bring it up? If you want to interpret that to mean the company doesn't care about small investors, that's your prerogative. They are not designing this for crypto traders. It would be fun if they were (for me as well), but they aren't. So that's that.
(In regard to the bolded sentence) because you failed to explain to the community, at which point shall you take step to get an exchange. They are wanting that, expecting that, and from your old explanation (IIRC, the community manager before you, the one which more open and polite) they
will do that once they have a tangible product or a demand, as I said, I failed to recall correctly. And at this point, where you have more than one building, I believe some people are entitled to ask if your category of tangible products (in this matter, buildings and office spaces) or a demand is already reached?
if you answer that your category of spaces are not yet achieved, despite the number of buildings you already have, then the next question will be at which milestone? How many buildings do you aim to own before you declare you have tangible products?
If you answer that your demand is not yet reached, thus no effort for an exchangeI yet, I would question why, despite the numerous buildings you have, you still have a very low demands?