An interesting aspect of this matter is the obvious ease with which this event slides into peoples' belief sets, one way or the other, and without hardly any facts they are ready to argue it. In a interesting turn, that the Dems have to go this far back and present a case that's this weak actually shows the good character of the nominee. They are truly scraping the bottom of the barrel to find faults here.

In a better and wiser time and place the rule here would be "Let him who is without fault cast the first stone." But we're not in such a time and place. This is a pure and raw attempt to gain power and to not lose additional power.

It's an all out effort to prevent a 6-3 conservative to liberal Supreme Court.

I'm not so worried about that because the SC judges have shown that they don't vote and think as people thought they would. At least that's true of the supposedly conservative ones. Think - Roberts.

But it's clear that it would be very frightening to the so-called liberal. Of course that means he's been told this would be frightening and believed it, doesn't mean it would really be. It's not just a looming 6-3 but with Ginsburg on her way out, quite likely the court will go 7-2. And that's just the way it seems it will be. 30-50 years of a court that won't bow to the demands of "liberals" who in reality are pushing fascist and totalitarian, anti-constitutional agendas, often for corrupt interests or interests outside of the US.

In the upcoming mid terms, expect total corruption on the part of the Democrats. Fake ballot boxes being found everywhere, any and everything to be done to try to gain congressional and senate seats. As usual, Republicans to win have to win "above the bounds of stuffed and fraudulent ballots".