Nobody legally requires AML/KYC for crypto gambling or crypto-related websites because there is no international consensus or single definition on what rules should apply.
As long as no FIAT is involved then AML/KYC are virtually non-existent requirements.
I have no idea what the sense of your nonsense post it, but in many jurisdictions AML/KYC laws are also applicable for crypto currencies!
Oh Lord here we go again... Please provide
1) the name of any jurisdiction where crypto can be traded without using FIAT and WITHOUT providing AML/KYC
2) the name of any jurisdiction where crypto can be traded without using FIAT but MUST provide AML/KYC
3) the name of any jurisdiction where crypto casinos are lawful WITHOUT providing AML/KYC
4) the name of any jurisdiction where crypto casinos are lawful WITH MANDATORY AML/KYC
As mentioned, if any conversion of crypto either FIAT>CRYPTO or CRYTPO>FIAT takes place then various regulations kick in no matter which country the exchanger/trader is located or registered in.
If all transactions taking place are simply CRYPTO>CRYPTO then there are plenty of jurisdictions around the world where AML/KYC on those websites is not necessary or mandatory.
The best way to deal with game-protect is just to take everything he says with a dash of salt and lots of herbs and spices. He just seems to troll all the threads, seems to talk about legality and especially licensing but actually doesn't really understand the finer points of jurisdictions, and how crypto casinos fit into all that.
@OP thanks for really being active on the discussions here. A lot of important stuff that needs clarification, and really good to see people like you respond, even when there is criticism.