I see what you inadvertently did there, you introduced a magical "relevance" gatekeeper module. So you're not envisaging a decentralised solution and believe the future of science publishing lies in corporate-controlled permissioned chains? Or "databases" as they are also known.

Otherwise, if you can drop the "relevance" qualifier, find someone prepared to foot the biil for all that storage, then Bob's your free-for-all, must-publish-any-old-dross-or-lose-my-tenure uncle.

Cheers

Graham