Article link? You forgot to include the source. I found a different article
here if anyone wants to read that one.
If it was anyone else, I'd be skeptical, but David Chaum is a luminary in crypto. On that basis alone, consider me intrigued. Although I'm a little disappointed with the closed beta. If you want to claim you've built a better cryptocurrency, you should arguably start with the fundamentals of being open-source. As long as they make it public at some point, then I suppose we should give them the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps they don't want a million-and-one copycat ICOs trying to cash in on their ideas. Hopefully this doesn't become a trend for new projects, though.