No, but he uses a spreadsheet to manage his portfolio which sort of makes the inference obvious and also sets a fairly obvious context for the semantics of "appeal". Which I internally translate as "appeal to people outside the group". Anyone who uses a spreadsheet to manage their cryptocurrency activities isn't likely to be inclined to actually join the online special interest group, merely follow its progress or lack of.
 
The question was fairly specific and its meaning was clear "how the team intends to adapt if the market continues in this style of bear"

Your approach is the one grounded in reality. Every CLAMs holder is a member of "the team" and I'm motivated to challenge misleadingly-framed questions along the lines of "how will the team ..." which insinuate the existence of a subgroup with implied responsibility because if left unchallenged these misconceptions act to promote  "pluralistic ignorance" to the detriment of the group's operational effectiveness in this space. "Pluralistic ignorance may help to explain the bystander effect. If no-one acts, onlookers may believe others believe action is incorrect, and may therefore themselves refrain from acting."

Teal is something of an antidote to this because it directly addresses the "everyone waiting around for someone to do something" issue. It also offers practical advice and guidance on how to operate effectively in the context of a peer-to-peer networked cryptocurrency.

Cheers

Graham