Yeah. What cracks me up is how all y'all jumped down the throats of BCH developers for having a core dev discover a bug in a single (of several) Bitcoin Cash implementation, which was also never exploited.
Shoe's on the other door now. #justsayin
What are you talking about? Apparently this is a several years long issue that has ramifications on any forks of bitcoin too. So, it remains a bit unclear about your supposed "gotcha."
So, I don't know where you get off in some high and mighty righteous in any kind of found bug conversation.
It's not meant to be a gotcha, it is meant to be an observation upon double standards.
Yeah, but even if you are making a double standards assertion against bitcoiners, you are making that on kinds of strawman created implications as the ones that I already pointed out in my earlier post , and even HairyBeary posted an additional point with his question about whether a bcash developer had spotted the bug and informed the core developers of such. Of course, you could not answer because so far the spotter of the bug has been anonymous.
In the end, there had been commentary within the crypto community that bcashers had been attempting to make some kind of BIG deal out of this whole situation, when the reality is that the bug had the potential to cause a lot worse damage that would have had ramifications far beyond bitcoin.
Furthermore, no one has been proclaiming that bitcoin is perfect, and there remain certain kinds of vulnerabilities including the narrowly dodged bullet of this latest bug find. So, even though bitcoin might continue to have some if it's problems, it still seems quite fair to attempt to bash bcash in any way reasonably (and perhaps even unreasonably) possible because 1) there is more centralization in that smaller project, 2) they are largely engaging in a kind of fraud through various kinds of attempts to mislead people into thinking that they are the real bitcoin, 3) they seem to have a lot higher incompetency largely based on seemingly bitcoin rejects going over to that project and 4) there are probably a few more decent justifications that I am not thinking about at the moment based on my preference just to ignore the whole project except for the fact that they continue to exist like a zombie attack vector that won't go away including having peeps like you continuing to spew out the various nonsense talking points in order to attempt to keep frankenstein alive.