Wagered/bankroll is quite low.
While that is true, it also helps to look at the reasons why it's the case.
One that is very evident is the bankrolls being of a significant size, without checking (so please correct me if I am wrong), I think CG currently holds the biggest bankrolls among crowdfunded sites for BTC and ETH.
If we take a look at the total numbers instead of the proportion, the wagers do not seem so low after all.
Instead of chasing elevatedly high wager levels to satisfy any kind of br/wager ratio, investors that think the wagers are too low can opt to divest, decreasing the bankroll size and restoring balance this way.
I don't get why are you talking like that, I'm just an investor at Crypto-Games.
And the people responding are players at CG who aren't interested in a busta* like game, you have to respect that in the same way they have to respect your opinion.
I don't see why shouldn't it be added, so gamblers would have more options to spend money at the casino.
Because more isn't necessarily better. And sometimes the best thing is to stay focused and instead of trying to do everything, do what you already do in the best way possible.
That doesn't mean there won't be any new games at CG, it just means the time has to be picked right and the game has to be as well.