It seems to me that what we're observing here is central planers trying to defend their monopoly.
If you believe that there are central planers and a monopoly, then you don't understand Bitcoin.And the fact that central planners have been stating for quite long that they "don't care about miners" is most likely only going to accelerate the process.
Miners are often idiots and don't decide anything (they shouldn't anyways).So if Bitcoin is here to stay, new implementations coming into existence are inevitable.
Many have tried.this is given that you completely ignore that any attempt at a secondary implementation so far has been amateurish at best.
And no matter how much you'd want to, you can't stop anyone from running a compatible yet alternative implementation of a bitcoin node.
If you want to, then you're free to swim in second-grade garbage. 