maybe people who say fraud is the one who feels the loss in this project, but some people say this is a very good project, so in my opinion this is a form of disappointment for the person who is disadvantaged from this project ... sorry if I'm wrong ...
It would be a decent project but it's spearheaded by an inexperienced yet egocentric team. Richard Ells has little credibility even outside of blockchain, and none within. It's probably not an intentional scam, but the way it's being pumped today, it has real Ponzi-like qualities.
Ponzi?
LOL
Anyway, looks like you did well, even tho this is only a tiny fraction of where ETN is going
You said you were only going in for short term. Sell already or do you expect to see more before you sell? I would go for long term, but you know what I think lol
Must be happy you invested
Yes, Ponzi. Someone has taken responsibility for pumping it, FOMO driving the price up further and then bringing it back down again - that is, the last investors will get burned and the early ones make the money.
Im going to milk it for all its worth then get out before it goes pear-shaped, as in beyond the point of no return.
Im happy I made money, Im not happy it was at the expense of my integrity doing it off the back of something I dont believe in.
It is not a tiny fraction of anything, if you think 800 BTC worth of trade will flow through ETN each day then you are gravely mistaken. Also, what is this about locked wallets, not the first time its happened either is it?
Responsible citation?
800 will be well surpassed
They upgraded and once finished, most found that when they logged out and back in they were fine
The couple people reporting they are still receiving the message, have/should create ticket, as this is not common
Enivitable with a project which has a level of centralization to it. Sometimes being a decentralized-centralized hybrid is a double edge sword.
You really shouldnt feel bad because ETN is a crypto, and like any legit crypto, it has dynamics that a ponzi doesnt have, as they are not alike in definition.