Post
Topic
Board Politics & Society
Re: hydrocarbon energy is a dead end
by
Barmalei06
on 25/09/2018, 10:01:08 UTC
None of this has anything whatsoever to do with wireless power transmission, which is completely irrelevant to the use of hydrocarbon fuels for energy.
[/quote]
Currently, there are 3 types of energy transfer.
1. Inductance coils.
Disadvantages:
- low power
- short distances
- coefficient of efficiency <40%
Transmission is almost impossible. About this Testa wrote in 1899.
so he began to study and put experiments with atmospheric electricity.
These are exploring it covered with mysteries and mysteries.
2. Transmission of energy by microwaves, with a wavelength of 12 centimeters.
The problem here is that it was easy to convert energy into microwaves, but back
3.energy transfer by laser.
It is possible only in an airless space, because in the air the laser loses more than 95% of the power.

And what about the storage of energy, then the energy needs to be worked out in the right amount at the time when it is needed. And since Tesla's atmospheric electricity has many secrets and mysteries, we can consider, for example, cold fusion, which is much safer, more ecological. Although they say that this is not possible, it is not so. There were ready working models of reactors with successful processes.
I tend to believe that someone is trying not to let such technologies.
For example, there are ready-made engines on the water, instead of hydrocarbons. With a very simple property of decomposition of water into hydrogen and oxygen. But they are allowed to develop .