+1 we just have to accept that wealthier individuals are going to have more voting power. dont try to fight it.
No we don't. Why do we have to accept it?? It can just as easily be implemented without costs, please explain why does a vote has to be paid by the voters. (honest question, not trolling)
that issue doesnt need to be taken into consideration by the person making the voting system. it needs to be taken in to consideration by the person creating the ballots.
On the contrary, it is something that has to be there from the start. So that noone will have to find a way to avoid it during a poll.
Stating that "try to put limits on how much stake someone can use to vote than a whale will simply break his stake up into multiple accounts"
and that "1 vote per account than fraudsters will make a zillion accounts with one nxt each" so to counter that we should charge a vote
is equal to putting a gun in someones head. How can the thousands that only have one nxt participate?
I can see a lot of people here asking for votes to be paid, and for a veiled centralised committee.
I cannot understand any reason WHY does someone have to pay in order to vote. The only reason that makes sense to me is that
we are actively trying to make people NOT vote. Then, like in our polls, only 40-50 people will vote, and we will call this "the community" and not "the ~50 that showed up"