Besides, from a logical point of view a person who owns a lot of NXT deserves to have "more of a say" in any voting mechanism.
Can you logically elaborate on that ?? It sounds completely irrational and feudal to me. so 10th Century..
Why does a whale have more saying than a tuna? Are they not swimming in the same waters?
Yes my explanation is in the part of my sentence you cut off:
Besides, from a logical point of view a person who owns a lot of NXT deserves to have "more of a say" in any voting mechanism
since the outcome will affect his holding more than someone who owns 100NXT.