It's your opinion, but you still don't know WHY they did that.
From the moment it is demonstrated (not supposed, demonstrated) that behind these photos the individuals are real, have backcgrounds, have left many digital traces... explain to me how the answer to this question has some interest? (I anticipate: to appear "more beautiful", more "credible" from a marketing point of view - failed, therefore - ? , follow the advice of their communication manager? etc...)
Quote
IMO I think it was for hidding their faces because I don't recognize Donkersloot and Bouman.
We're agree "your opinion"....Now, I admit I don't know what to tell you...
Quote
The subject is about the Securix ICO, not me. I don't sell anything. Thank you.
Yes, you are selling your hypothesis (and that's quite respectable)
Now, what you do is more and more like a form of harassment (whether here, or on the French forum). And I repeat, I don't "defend" Securix because I did their translation BUT because I know him better now.
If the project was rotten, I would abandon it without regret.
But I consider it unfair to compromise the efforts of a team with such weak arguments
(and when I talk about compromising, I am of course thinking of the FUD that this kind of debate provokes, the associations of keywords on search engines, etc...)