Oh, I'm grateful to you for not mentioning me just because I do not agree with OP. Thank you! Merit is not a problem, you think, I can not afford to buy it? I'm just an honest person who does not hide behind merit or high rank, I do not need this to freely express my point of view. I'm very sorry that you consider me an accomplice to this exchange, I'm sorry...

So, you see the problem is that the exchange did not warn the client about the possibility of KYC, kept its funds until it provided the ID. Most likely they are wrong, but I'm not sure that one should ignore the fact that the client in this situation sent fake at least once.

Following this thread, I saw that the exchange does not deny this problem, claiming that it will return the funds after it establishes the identity of the OP. I say, if they denied it, I would consider them scammers, however, I do not understand why this person does not want to provide ID. He will not provide it, he clearly fears this. He is afraid for his life! Nonsense My opinion is that this guy is one of those who ran into KYC when he performed an illegal operation.

LoyceV, I do not have the right to such an opinion?

So, we store popcorn and watch the number of accusations in the forum. Believe me, they will, I'm sure. This guy will turn your attention to completely idiotic moments, like, for example, postponing the timing of the token listing. Here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4996666.0

LoyceV, if you did not guess, I'll tell you, it's alt of Mr. NI. Perhaps this guy is directly connected to Privcoin, since the second thread arose in a few days. Accident? I do not believe in this!

Is it not funny! He behaves like a child. Complains wherever he can, cries how he was offended by «scammers who asked for ID». I do not like it, because all that is needed to return coins, is to send ID, and forget about this story.