There are many models and definitions of intelligence. The IQ usually is measured in an academic form, regardless of the culture of the subjects being tested. Therefore we measure, what WE think intelligence is, bringing disadvantages for certain groups. Intelligence needs to be considered always with the context someone is in.
For me, intelligence is how to be smart and cognitively adaptable compared to others in the same surrounding and it should also include the emotional intelligence and creativity and other non-academic measures.
Please don't try to redefine intelligence to include "emotions, creativity and other non-academic measures"... that is NOT intelligence
It sounds like you are trying to give everyone a participation trophy for intelligence
Intelligence is what it is... some people have it, others don't... similarly, some people are good at sports, and others are not... you don't need to pretend that chess is a sport in order to make intelligent people feel better about sucking at physical activity...
Some people are creative, others intelligent... these are 2 completely different things... why try to put them in the same category?