His rating should be invalid since he is a scammer. Would you trust a confirmed scammer more than a suspected one? He used his status to gain money.
I just want to chime in and say that this logic is stupid, ESPECIALLY since that @Blazed is
not a "confirmed" scammer, as there is no evidence or references left in those negs.
But based on your logic, are you stating that anyone with an unreferenced negative feedback in their trust history shouldn't be trusted? I don't give a rat's ass who left the feedback. If there's no reference or evidence of a scam, then I'm sorry, but
"Scammed XXXX" means shit to me.
Based on this situation, and your post history, it's obvious that you're just salty because your main account has a neg on it that was left by either (1) @Blazed or (2) someone in Blazed's DT list.