i will keep repeating that all investors wanted was a proactive approach similar to what monero admins did. My question is if their was no issue with the previous algo and there was no indication that their was limitation issues that was been abused, then why was the last update released. And do you think you and the dev would have taken that long deciding on how to proceed with the the matter if you or the dev actually had funds invested when the coin stabilized at 1k, or would you have kept on chilling on a decison while you watch your investment squander from from a solid 1k stability to lower 200 sat. To make matters worse the individual responsible has also accumulated enough coins to control the value for a really long time.

As for octaex, you guys might not be directly responsible but i can't imagine how many poor souls where lead to that exchange from the shilling of an unknown exchange from the admin staff to head on over there to trade. i mean it was listed all over the announcement page, a constant topic on discord and this forum. Just the same way you were berating someone on discord for trying to protect investors from some unknown exchange, and you claiming that it was the individual's freedom of speech to promote whatever exchange they want, am sure if that ends up been a scam exchange too, you will claim zero responsibility, even though the attempt could have been nipped before it became a problem.

As for my comment about something astray, it does become a problem when you tout a decentralized platform and its obvious that one acct is in control of over 50% of the hashrate, in such an instance an immediate action is needed to neutralize the act that cos it goes against everything this sphere was created for.

As for my comment about letting early investors down, am quite sure that your disappointment about my few comments is nothing compared to how an individual who invested in this coin when it had achieved a solid stability at 1k felt to watch their investment squander to the lower 200 sats due to inaction from the the devs part. So again if you need a model to see were the team went wrong with relation to that, then view the monero's dev's action to protect their investors. Its funny how i have repeated that monero line for awhile now and you always comfortably ignore it cos you know its hits it right on the spot.

 As i have stated already if you are so disappointment by my comments, you can block me so you don't have to see it anymore but best believe i plan to keep ppl aware of all the facets related to the coin, not just the happy go lucky rainbow colored bs shills.