My original plan was to land a couple clients, and then expose myself later on when I had a bunch of experience, and I did some good work for the community. This was earlier than expected, but what can you do.
How did you possibly conclude that, your plan was gonna work? Your campaign management has never been
bad, your judgement of things have been though. And that is why some people think you're a con artist/scammer/naive person et al.
Here's the timeline
Late 2015- I talked to the original owner, and we made a deal where I would use his account to learn about BTC, and just grow with the community.
I was in possession of the account, all the way until a couple weeks back, in which someone sort of wanted to trial the account for a week, and then I got it back. If you check my posts, there was a quite well made post addressing a scam accusation. Down below.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4765774.msg43073635#msg43073635TLDR - Bought account when account buying was fine, and then lended out a couple months back for a week, still have it. Only 3 people have had access to aTriz.
So I assume you also brought the private keys of aTriz's staked message back in 2013/14?
That's not how the trust system should work and it's borderline fallacy. DT is not some sort of police force and even if it was you probably wouldn't want every cop in the town to respond to every crime.
The fact that e.g. I tagged some (or many) fake ICOs or PayPal scammers doesn't mean I'm obligated to tag them all. The fact that The Pharmacists tagged some (or many) account traders doesn't mean that he's obligated to tag them all. Everyone has their own, possibly subjective, criteria and decision process and that's what makes the trust system work. Otherwise we could just have theymos tag everyone, when he has time between recovering hacked accounts and developing the new forum software.
But sir DT means Death Team and all scammers are supposed to die...
I think all these questions aren't related to the aTriz/zapo being questioned here, since the account was bought in 2015, so hashcows and his buddy aren't related to the current owner of the accounts aTriz and Zapo.
@Zapo, can you sign a message with the addresses that aTriz owned via this account with today's date?