I had read that thread back when I was reading up on the controversies of the time. It doesn't really tell the whole story though. Whether this was an oversight on your part trying to move on from the Atriz brand at the time or not; but there is no accusation or proof on your part they did anything wrong. I don't even see any feedback from any of your accounts
I obviously don't know the details, but given the current situation (see below), it might have been a good idea to have aired the dirty laundry and had pinkman tagged. Assuming the reason you have for not paying them was NEG worthy. All I can find is the positive feedback you left pinkman that is still positive but has (delete) at the end of it.
I may not have been clear in the previous post. Not trying to beat a dead horse but care to share any details that resulted in you being back stabbed. Provide as much or as little extra info as you wish, but my interest is whether or not repayment not continuing is justified.
I would also suggest that the more questions you do answer, the less information you should leave out. It may help in avoiding situations like this where maybe you aren't managing a campaign or bounty for them, but you are involved with them, as a contracted employee to say the least.
I am not involved with jamal. He offered me a job, so I checked the telegram group, but I haven't made a decision yet.
I'd recommend you to not involve payment issues from Jamal, over to me. All of the ICO's you've listed have exit scammed, blocked me, or I've done the work for them (final sheet). I don't see how I'm lying/deceiving here.
You cannot say you are not involved with someone and that you think about making a decision on a job offer they made you WHEN:
*snip*
The work he gave for me managing spreadsheets was work I asked for, so I can make some income. I don't see how managing a couple spreadsheet means that I'm his right man.