Honestly, if I were in your shoes, I'd think about a good strategy to phase out the MYST token completely and replace it with another, more general currency (i.e. BTC/ETH) without completely screwing over current holders. I'm not sure if such a solution exists, and it will probably give a lot of grief in the short term in any case, but in the long run, I really don't see a way around it.

Otherwise, you are coupling the future of your project to a number of unknowns of which you simply don't have any influence and, even worse, which are not directly related to your base project. I mean, even if your token was the best solution (whch I still highly doubt), looking at the overall Ethereum token craze aftermath would lead me to the solution that we'll see a huge drop in interest in that particular field. And then you have to explain to a completely disillusioned and fed up public "yeah, we know most tokens suck, but we are legit, trust us!". They won't listen.

And this "exploring various possibilities", come on. You are a VPN project, that's where your focus should lay. Are you seriously trying to shoehorn your token into your system, even if it is a bad fit? What if all the evidence would tell you that it was a bad idea, and commiting to it, no matter what, won't make it a good idea?

Also, in addition to hiring economy people, it might be a good idea to get some outside people to take a look at what you're doing. People who don't have to toot the companies horn in order to not lose their job, you know…