Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: Lutpin and Bitvest
by
Lauda
on 06/10/2018, 11:31:35 UTC
Lightlord got negative ratings not long ago for not paying both campaigns, he refilled the escrow wallets, now lutpin is the one not paying, logic follows that he should get a negative rating as well until he pays.
There is no logic that can follow out of subjective tags from disgruntled semi-spammers. Those that tagged him can tag Lutpin if they want to. They don't have to, and doing so won't help them either.

''He can justifiably take his time, and your envy won't change any of that.'' Define Justifiably, specific number of days. Keep in mind this is 12+ weeks. And he could have paid since September 17th.
Are you blaming Lutpin, i.e. adding to his time, the time during which the funds were not deposited in escrow? "Logic follows" indeed. Cheesy

The solution seems simple, and is up solely to the employer. Find someone else, transfer funds to him and let them handle it. Although reading into the thread, there seem to have been issues with the other campaign as well.