Power 100%
CPU +100
Memory +950
270 watts consumption of video card
Past results with these settings/fixed a bug in the post
For ETH(Claymore ) 57.7 Mh/s
Power 73%
CPU -480
Memory +950
180 watts consumption of video card
CPU +100
Memory +950
270 watts consumption of video card
Past results with these settings/fixed a bug in the post
For ETH(Claymore ) 57.7 Mh/s
Power 73%
CPU -480
Memory +950
180 watts consumption of video card
I wouldnt recommend 100% Power. Another thing that you need to keep in mind is to keep lower energy
Wow that's very disappointing. Just 88 Sol/s for 2080ti with 144_5? I already get now 80 Sol/s with 1080ti at full power. That's just 10% increase for nearly double the money for the new GPU. Bummer.
Perhaps EWBF_ can do some magic with new code optimizations or perhaps using Tensor Cores or RT Cores for mining too - if that's possible in any way I don't know. Otherwise Turing will be a big flop for us miners
Those card aren't optimized yet on the new Miner release. Remember it has faster memory of GDDR6 which would highly benefit EthHash rather than equi.Perhaps EWBF_ can do some magic with new code optimizations or perhaps using Tensor Cores or RT Cores for mining too - if that's possible in any way I don't know. Otherwise Turing will be a big flop for us miners
Hmm still dissappointed. As markiz73 wrote, 2080ti delivers about 57.7 Mh/s with EthHash and costs 1200$ and above. For that money I can buy 3 RX Vegas each of them delivering about 42Mh/s when optimized. So in total I get 126Mh/s with 3 Vegas for 1200$. So you can say Vega beats the shit out of Turing for the same hardware invest. So no need to buy any Turing at all so far. Too bad I had high hopes for new Nvidia Generation