I agree, the conversation is becoming more and more confused, although for me one real cause of the problem is obvious - forging an identifier at least once. I have already said that after this act, ni23457 shares guilt with exchange 50/50. What I see now! This guy is trying to get the exchange to return him a coin without KYC, threatening to ruin the company's reputation. Who will say that this is the right thing after having compromised itself by giving a fake?

No one sees this fact, but for me this is the most important moment! And yes, I advise you to read the article in which one guy collected facts about how ni23457 affects the reputation of the exchange.

https://medium.com/@arennathan9/changenow-scam-or-review-how-ni23457-blackmails-the-exchange-978c483ef81a